[US-28] As a user, I want replies to default to the same protocol a message arrived on, so conversations don't fragment across channels. #3
Labels
No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
ELFA/rfd#3
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Defined as NOT [In-scope]
citing @jeremiah it would require integrating a bridge to every protocol and recreating the particular message app's capabilities within ELFA.
US-28to [US-28][US-28]to [US-28] As a user, I want replies to default to the same protocol a message arrived on, so conversations don't fragment across channels.yes, definitely as NOT in scope, specially because it depends on having a unified messenger, which isn't decided yet. see #4
But it will eventually be in scope... one day.